Cambridge IELTS 19 Test 4 Writing Task 2: Imported Food
Cambridge IELTS 19 · Test 4 · Academic Writing Task 2Opinion (agree or disagree)Culture & lifestyle
The question states that in many countries consumers can now buy food produced all over the world in their local supermarket. Candidates must decide whether this is a positive or negative development and support their opinion.
The question
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Write at least 250 words.
Free and timed, with a live word count, just like the computer-delivered test. Then get an instant AI band score.
The exam simulator runs on a computer. Open this page on a laptop or desktop to practise.
How to read the question
- This is an opinion essay in the form positive or negative development. You must make a clear judgement, either mainly positive, mainly negative or a clearly explained mixed view, and keep it consistent.
- The focus is the development itself: the global food supply in supermarkets. Discuss its effects on consumers, farmers, economies and the environment, not supermarkets in general.
- Development implies a change over time, so you can compare the present with the past, when people mainly ate local and seasonal produce.
- Consider more than one group: consumers gain choice and year-round availability, while local farmers and the environment may lose out, which gives you material for a balanced but decisive answer.
- Avoid drifting into an essay about healthy eating, fast food or online shopping, which are different topics.
- If you choose a mainly positive view, acknowledge the main drawback, such as the carbon cost of transporting food, and explain why the benefits still outweigh it.
Suggested position
Although transporting food over long distances has environmental costs, I believe that the global availability of food in supermarkets is a largely positive development, because it gives consumers greater variety and food security and supports farmers in exporting countries.
Paragraph plan
- 1
Introduction
Paraphrase the situation that supermarkets now sell food from around the world, and state your view: largely positive, despite environmental drawbacks.
- 2
Body paragraph 1: benefits
Explain the benefits for consumers (wider variety, fruit and vegetables all year, a more varied diet, cultural exchange through cuisine) and for producer countries, such as farmers in developing nations earning income from exports like coffee, bananas or avocados. Mention greater food security when local harvests fail.
- 3
Body paragraph 2: drawbacks and why they can be managed
Acknowledge the carbon emissions from air and sea freight and the pressure on local farmers who cannot compete on price. Then argue that these problems can be reduced through clear labelling, support for local agriculture and choosing seasonal produce where possible.
- 4
Conclusion
Restate that the development is largely positive, while recognising that consumers and governments should limit its environmental and economic downsides.
Ideas and arguments
- Consumers enjoy a far wider choice of food, including fruit and vegetables that cannot be grown locally, such as bananas in northern Europe.
- Seasonal produce is available all year round, which helps people maintain a varied and healthy diet.
- Global trade improves food security, because shortages caused by a poor local harvest can be covered by imports.
- Exports provide income and jobs for farmers in developing countries, for example coffee growers in Ethiopia or Colombia.
- Trying food from other countries increases understanding of other cultures and encourages culinary creativity.
- Transporting food long distances, especially by air, produces significant carbon emissions, a problem often described as food miles.
- Local farmers may be unable to compete with cheaper imports, which can damage rural economies and traditional produce.
- Imported fresh food may be picked early and stored for long periods, so it can be less fresh and flavoursome than local produce.
Band 8+ model answer
289 words · An original model answer written for ieltswrites, not an official answer. It stays in English, as in the exam.
In many parts of the world, shoppers can now walk into their local supermarket and choose from food grown on every continent. Although this global trade has some environmental costs, I believe that it is a largely positive development.
The most obvious benefit is the far greater choice it offers consumers. People in cooler countries can buy tropical fruit such as bananas and mangoes, and many fruits and vegetables are now available all year round rather than only in season. This makes it easier for families to maintain a varied and healthy diet. Global supply chains also strengthen food security, because a poor harvest in one region no longer means empty shelves, as supplies can be imported from elsewhere. Moreover, this trade is a vital source of income for farmers in many developing countries, where crops such as coffee, cocoa and avocados provide valuable export earnings and support entire rural communities. Exposure to foreign ingredients has also enriched culinary traditions, encouraging people to experiment with dishes from other cultures.
Admittedly, there are significant drawbacks. Transporting food thousands of kilometres, particularly by air freight, adds considerably to carbon emissions. In addition, cheap imports can undercut local farmers, some of whom struggle to remain in business. Nevertheless, I would argue that these problems can be managed without giving up the benefits. Clear labelling of a product's origin allows consumers to choose seasonal and local produce when it is available, and governments can support domestic agriculture through subsidies or promotion of regional products.
In conclusion, while the environmental and economic costs of imported food should not be ignored, I believe that the advantages for consumers and producers around the world outweigh them, making the global availability of food a positive change overall.
Why this answer scores highly
- Task Response
- The essay gives a clear judgement that the development is largely positive, supports it with developed benefits for consumers and producer countries, deals with the environmental and local farming drawbacks, and keeps the same position throughout.
- Coherence and Cohesion
- The benefits and the drawbacks are each given a paragraph, the concession is clearly signalled, and cohesive devices such as as a result, admittedly and nevertheless link ideas smoothly.
- Lexical Resource
- Topic-specific language such as year-round availability, food security, food miles, export earnings and undercut is used precisely, and the key idea of the question is paraphrased in several ways.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy
- The essay uses a range of complex structures, including relative clauses, conditional forms, passive constructions and concessive clauses, accurately and naturally.
Useful vocabulary
- imported produce
- food, especially fruit and vegetables, brought in from other countries
- year-round availability
- being available in every season
- seasonal produce
- food that is naturally grown and harvested at a particular time of year
- food miles
- the distance food travels from where it is produced to where it is eaten
- carbon footprint
- the amount of carbon dioxide produced by an activity
- food security
- reliable access to enough affordable, nutritious food
- a varied diet
- eating many different types of food
- global supply chain
- the international system of producing, transporting and selling goods
- export earnings
- money a country or producer earns by selling goods abroad
- undercut
- sell something more cheaply than a competitor
- local farmers
- people who grow food in the area where it is sold
- air freight
- transporting goods by plane
- culinary
- connected with cooking and food
- outweigh
- be greater or more important than something else
Common mistakes
- Describing both advantages and disadvantages without ever deciding whether the development is positive or negative overall.
- Writing about supermarkets in general, such as convenience or opening hours, instead of the availability of food from all over the world.
- Focusing only on consumers and ignoring wider effects on farmers, developing countries and the environment.
- Making exaggerated claims such as imported food is always unhealthy or all local farmers will go out of business.
- Changing position in the conclusion, for example calling the development positive in the introduction and mainly harmful at the end.
- Repeating food from all over the world instead of paraphrasing with imported produce, international food products and goods from overseas.
Frequently asked questions
- Which Cambridge book is this question from?
- This question about supermarkets selling food produced all over the world is Writing Task 2 of Test 4 in Cambridge IELTS 19 Academic, published in 2023.
- Can I say the development is both positive and negative?
- Yes, but you should still make an overall judgement, for example that it is mainly positive despite some drawbacks, and explain why one side outweighs the other.
- What examples can I use for imported food?
- Simple, accurate examples work best, such as bananas or coffee that cannot be grown in cooler countries, fruit flown in out of season, and farmers in developing countries who rely on exports.
- How many words should I write for this Task 2?
- Write at least 250 words; about 270-310 words is enough to give a clear judgement and develop it in 40 minutes.
Free and timed, with a live word count, just like the computer-delivered test. Then get an instant AI band score.
The exam simulator runs on a computer. Open this page on a laptop or desktop to practise.